The decisions register
The concluded rulings of the courts of Octavium, published in full. 6 on the record.
| Published | Date | Court | Case and holding | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMO-0050 | 2026-09-13 | Appeals Court | MissVexlyn v The State Thrown out before trial |
THROWN OUT BEFORE TR… |
| JMO-0043 | 2026-09-09 | Appeals Court | MaybeVyian v The State Criminal appeal · 1.1.4 Failure to Comply · conviction entered without service, counsel or hearing · 8.1.3 · the materiality test · fresh evidence under 8.1.2 · self-contradiction in the findings · quashing and remittal · dissent The appellant, one of four Commandants appointed for the portrait burning parade of 5 September 2026, was convicted in JMO-0041 under 1.1.4 Failure to Comply and sentenced to a penance. The complaint was filed at 00:39 on 6 September and judgement was entered at 14:48 on 7 September. |
APPEAL ALLOWED. THE … |
| JMO-0045 | 2026-09-09 | Appeals Court | larpations v The State Three appeals by one man consolidated for judgement · divisional blacklist after an approved discharge · a commander bound by his own approval · 8.1.5 and the reservation of sentencing · 1.1.4 and the chain of command · 1.1.5 command misconduct · adverse inference from the silence of a called party · 1.1.4 failure to comply by absence · the materiality test for a procedural defect · parity of tariff between co offenders · a sentence instrument reciting a ground the judgement did not find · dissents The appellant brought three matters before this Ministry within two days, and the Court consolidated them so that one man's conduct in one week should be judged once. The first is an appeal against a blacklist imposed on him by the Gendarmeric Division after that Division's own commander had approved his discharge. |
THREE MATTERS CONSOL… |
| JMO-0046 | 2026-09-09 | Appeals Court | Voraius v The State Appeal against a liquidation entry · executive act of the Inquisition without charge, case number or trial · rectification of a record rather than review of a sentence · restoration proved by the State's own registers · annotation and not expungement The appellant complained that the published record shows him liquidated although he says he was pardoned. He filed nothing in support. |
APPEAL ALLOWED IN PA… |
| JMO-0036 | 2026-09-01 | Appeals Court | Bardamcz v The State Withdrawn by the party that brought it |
WITHDRAWN |
| JMO-0035 | 2026-08-30 | Appeals Court | CastilloKHorrigan v The State Withdrawn with the approval of the court |
WITHDRAWN |
The public law database of the Imperium of Octavium. Laws passed by the Senate and the decisions of the courts enter this register automatically. No sign-in is required.